Lindsay Clancy juror expressed reasonable doubt but did not agree to acquit, foreperson states

<p>Roni Carlson, the jury foreperson in the trial of Lindsay Clancy, stated that one juror expressed reasonable doubt regarding Clancy's guilt but refused to agree to an acquittal. This information was shared in an interview that aired on Monday, following the trial's conclusion in a mistrial.</p><p>In the interview with <a href="https://www.nbcboston.com/news/local/lindsay-clancy-trial-juror-interview-video/4011169/">NBC 10 Boston</a>, Carlson confirmed that the holdout juror could not be persuaded to acquit Clancy based on a defense of insanity.</p><p><em>In the US, call the <a href="https://mchb.hrsa.gov/programs-impact/national-maternal-mental-health-hotline">national maternal health hotline</a> at <a href="">1-833-852-6262</a>. In the UK, the <a href="https://pandasfoundation.org.uk/">Pandas foundation</a> offers support via WhatsApp at 07903 508334. In Australia, the <a href="https://www.panda.org.au/">national maternal and perinatal mental health hotline</a> is 1300 726 306.</em></p>