AI-Debiased Article
Rewritten from Ars Technica 1 min read
4 Wire-neutral provisional

✓ No loaded language, vague sourcing, or framing detected.

New Jersey requests Supreme Court ruling on state regulation of sports betting on prediction markets

New Jersey has asked the Supreme Court to clarify whether states can regulate sports betting on prediction markets like Kalshi. This request follows a ruling by the US Court of Appeals for the 3rd Circuit that determined such bets are classified as swaps, placing them under the jurisdiction of the CFTC.

Companies
Kalshi
People
Jennifer Davenport

<p>New Jersey filed a request with the Supreme Court to determine if states have the authority to regulate sports betting on prediction markets, including Kalshi.</p><p>New Jersey Attorney General Jennifer Davenport stated in a press release that, "Companies like Kalshi claim to offer legal sports betting in all 50 states, but they refuse to follow the gambling laws of any state."</p><p>In April, the US Court of Appeals for the 3rd Circuit ruled that New Jersey lacks the authority to regulate sports bets on prediction markets. The court concluded that contracts related to sports events qualify as "swaps," which grants exclusive jurisdiction to the US Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC).</p><p><a href="https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2026/09/nj-urges-scotus-to-rule-that-kalshi-sports-bets-are-gambling-not-swaps/">Read full article</a></p><p><a href="https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2026/09/nj-urges-scotus-to-rule-that-kalshi-sports-bets-are-gambling-not-swaps/#comments">Comments</a></p>

Annotating as

No note attached

on this article.

Original vs. Neutral

Original Headline

Supreme Court urged to let states regulate sports bets on prediction markets

Neutral Headline

New Jersey requests Supreme Court ruling on state regulation of sports betting on prediction markets