<p>New Jersey filed a request with the Supreme Court to determine whether states have the authority to regulate sports betting on prediction markets, including Kalshi.</p><p>New Jersey Attorney General Jennifer Davenport stated in a press release, "Companies like Kalshi claim to offer legal sports betting in all 50 states, but they refuse to follow the gambling laws of any state."</p><p>In April, the US Court of Appeals for the 3rd Circuit ruled that New Jersey does not have the authority to regulate sports bets on prediction markets. The court concluded that contracts related to sports events qualify as "swaps," which grants exclusive jurisdiction to the US Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC).</p>
Why this rating? · 1 signal
Signals flagged in the original
- headline asserts a conclusion / scare-quotes
Provisional estimate — refines shortly Full breakdown ↓
New Jersey Requests Supreme Court Ruling on Kalshi Sports Betting Classification
New Jersey has requested the Supreme Court to clarify whether states can regulate sports betting on prediction markets like Kalshi. This follows a ruling by the US Court of Appeals for the 3rd Circuit, which determined that such bets are classified as 'swaps' under federal law.
Compare the coverage
No note attached
on this article.
Read next
Language Analysis
Loaded Language Removed
- ✕ headline asserts a conclusion / scare-quotes
Original vs. Neutral
NJ urges SCOTUS to rule that Kalshi sports bets are gambling, not "swaps"
New Jersey Requests Supreme Court Ruling on Kalshi Sports Betting Classification