Brooklyn Democratic Party officials have received nearly $200,000 in campaign donations from judges and judicial candidates, raising concerns about potential pay-to-play practices. According to records, former party chairman Frank Seddio, current chair Rodneyse Bichotte-Hermelyn, and their associates have collected $190,000 from over 90 judges and judicial candidates since 2012. Critics argue that this undermines public confidence in the courts, as judges may appear dependent on party organizations for political support and endorsements.
Empire State judges face strict guidelines regarding political contributions, allowing them to purchase two tickets to political events at a maximum cost of $250 each. However, records indicate that judges attend numerous events annually. A spokesperson for the Office of Court Administration stated that the donations were authorized under the applicable time frames.
Insiders suggest that judges may circumvent restrictions by declaring their candidacies for county seats annually, allowing them to continue donating to political figures. Ben Weinberg, public policy director of Citizens Union, emphasized that these practices undermine the intent of the law, which aims to minimize judges' political and fundraising activities.
Additionally, Bichotte-Hermelyn's Shirley Chisholm Democratic Club has collected over $53,000 from judges and candidates since 2013, with payments often filed as "petition expenses" lacking detailed expense information. Political clubs like the Thomas Jefferson Club and Seneca Club are not registered as political committees, raising further concerns about compliance with campaign finance rules.
Seddio, facing lawsuits for alleged fraud, denied that donations influenced his endorsement process, stating he prioritizes qualifications and competency in selecting judges. Bichotte-Hermelyn also denied any influence of donations on endorsements and asserted compliance with campaign finance laws.
The Commission for Judicial Conduct did not respond to a request for comment but has previously cautioned judges regarding federal political contributions. Weinberg has called for a broader investigation into the matter, suggesting that the situation may warrant the appointment of a special prosecutor to ensure judicial independence from political donations.