In a recent letter to The New Yorker, a reader expressed gratitude for Becca Rothfeld’s review of Rachel Cusk’s book, "Life of M," published on August 24th and 31st. The reader noted that Rothfeld’s analysis helped clarify their own reaction to Cusk’s work, contrasting it with the narrative depth found in novels like "Anna Karenina" by Leo Tolstoy. They highlighted that while Cusk’s writing can leave a void by dismantling personhood, it also provides a sharp depiction of existential themes. The reader defended the "Outline" trilogy as a meaningful exploration of identity and meaning in a fragmented world, acknowledging Rothfeld’s critique while emphasizing the trilogy’s impact.
Additionally, the reader appreciated Alexandra Schwartz’s report on death doulas and hospice care, particularly the suggestion by doula Virginia Chang for her client Eleanor Lennard to donate her brain to science. The reader, a neuropathologist, affirmed the value of such donations for advancing public health and understanding neurological disorders, noting that these donations require specific arrangements beyond simply being an organ donor.
The letter also addressed a term used in Zach Helfand’s piece about the Old News Newsstand, published on August 10th. The reader criticized the use of the term "wifebeater" to describe a type of undershirt, arguing that it is offensive and suggests that the New Yorker should adopt more sensitive language in line with evolving editorial standards.
Finally, the reader humorously remarked on the Los Angeles Times’ delayed news delivery, suggesting that it should be included in the inventory of the Old News Newsstand, as it provides accounts of sports events that are often a day late. The letter concluded with a note on how to submit letters to the publication, indicating that they may be edited for length and clarity.